#### robdawg421

##### Member

Rw U2 x Rw U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Lw U2 Rw' U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Rw'

I figured the following changes to work for the following edges:

XXOXX 4Rw U2 x 4Rw U2 4Rw U2 4Rw' U2 4Lw U2 4Rw' U2 4Rw U2 4Rw' U2 4Rw'

XXOXX 3Rw U2 x 3Rw U2 3Rw U2 4Rw' U2 3Lw U2 3Rw' U2 3Rw U2 3Rw' U2 3Rw'

and

XOOOX 5Rw U2 x 5Rw U2 5Rw U2 5Rw' U2 5Lw U2 5Rw' U2 5Rw U2 5Rw' U2 5Rw'

XOOOX Rw U2 x Rw U2 Rw U2 5Rw' U2 Lw U2 Rw' U2 Rw U2 Rw' U2 Rw'

For the OXOXO case... I couldn't find a single algo fix. I realized that I could do one of each after each other... and that would fix it.. but was hoping there was a change to the wide slices I move to do this.

Any ideas on the variation?